Peer Review Process

The peer review process is a structured and demanding journey that each manuscript must undertake to reach publication. It begins with the initial submission, where the manuscript is assessed by reviewers for quality, originality, and adherence to academic standards. If the manuscript meets these standards, it moves forward to the Payment and Multimedia Submission stage, which secures its place in the upcoming online conference, a vital platform for scholarly exchange. However, if the reviewers see areas for improvement, the manuscript enters the Awaiting Revision phase, offering authors a chance to refine their work based on constructive feedback. This phase is a critical opportunity for authors to enhance the rigor and impact of their research before resubmitting. Unfortunately, if the manuscript does not meet the criteria and is outright rejected, the process concludes with no refund, emphasizing the high standards upheld by the review process.

Following a successful presentation at the online conference, the author submits the full paper for a second round of review, ensuring that the extended version meets the expectations of the academic community. If this full submission is rejected, authors receive a full refund, acknowledging the effort while maintaining transparency and fairness. Accepted papers enter the final review stage conducted by the publisher, where the manuscript undergoes a last rigorous evaluation to ensure alignment with publication quality standards. If approved, the manuscript is published, marking the end of a meticulous journey from submission to publication. However, a rejection at this final stage results in no refund, underscoring the high level of scrutiny at every step. This process, with its cycles of review, revision, and re-evaluation, serves as a gatekeeper to maintain the integrity, accuracy, and scholarly contribution of published research.